Unearthing more old jars and bottles

Many more jars and bottles have followed the initial discovery, all coming from the same, but now larger, 3′ x 3′ section of the woodlot, shown below.

Excavation hole and some glass bottles and jars found there.

The small 3' x 3' hole in the upper left of the photo yielded these bottles and many more glass fragments.

Below are a few examples of unbroken glassware with design patents imprinted on their bases.

Two 1930's jars and one bottle

Two 1930's jars and a bottle dug up in the woodlot

The middle jar’s design patent is 80918, filed January 27, 1930, from Forest Hills, New York. The right bottle’s design patent is 85925, filed April 1, 1931, from Toledo, Ohio. The left jar’s design patent number is 93179, filed June 30, 1934, from Washington, Pennsylvania.

The majority of unbroken jars and bottles don’t display design patents on their bases, but those that do have, so far, all been patented in the 1930′s. So, the thinly buried pile of glass in that small area of the woodlot may have begun to accumulate in the thirties or forties.

Most of the unbroken bottles and jars don’t have design patents on their bases. However, the fantastic Historic Bottle Website will enable further dating of these pieces. An initial review suggests that most are from 1950 or later…

Posted in Inventory | Leave a comment

Archeology in the backyard woodlot

Woodlot surface has small ridges and mounds covered by natural stick and leaf mulch

The woodlot has uneven, lumpy terrain compared to the rest of our site.

Jar discovered buried in the backyard woodlot.

Jar unearthed in the woodlot

The very back of our property is a small woodlot. While most of our land is level or gently sloping, the woodlot’s terrain is uneven and lumpy, as if the trees and vegetation grew on top of piles of trash. As it turns out, this may be exactly what has happened. Spending just a few hours digging into a 2′ x 2′ section of the soil has already uncovered at least 50 pounds of glass from broken bottles and jars. Some are still fully intact, like the one picturted to the right.

The bottom of this unbroken jar has raised characters saying, “DESIGN PATENT No 107801″ as shown in the closeup image below.

As defined by Wikipedia, a design patent “is a patent granted on the ornamental design of a functional item.” In hopes of learning more about when the glass might have been buried in our backyard, I searched the Google patent archive.

When searching for a typical patent in the Google archive, you just enter the numeric patent (e.g. “54321″) to find records of that invention. When searching for a design patent, however, you need to prefix the patent number with the letter “D”. So, searching for “D107801″ returned the following “Design for a Packer Jar” patent record filed on November 11, 1937, and accepted on January 4, 1938.

D107801 US design patent

Design patent 107801

The three ridges broken by a zig zag diagonal ridge at the bottom of the patent design drawing match the actual ornamentation of the jar from our woodlot — it’s a match!

This design patent was filed by George Smith, Jr., “residing at Olean, in the county of Cattaraugus and State of New York, U. S. A.” in his capacity as “assignor to Olean Glass Company” a corporation also based  in Olean, NY.

This suggests that my jar is no younger than 1938, and, since the term of the patent is 7 years, it was probably bought by former inhabitants of our property at some point during the early 1940′s. Could there be a connection between dumping used jars in the backyard and World War II?

Posted in Inventory | 1 Comment

What is neighborhood ecology?

What is the carrying capacity of my neighborhood? Beginning with my own property, I’m investigating whether my neighbors and I can sustain our lifestyles exclusively on the resources already in our neighborhood — sunlight, rainfall, flora, fauna, buildings, etc.

I’m beginning this investigation by inventorying my own property. The parcel is almost half an acre in area, and has six immediately distinct areas, as labelled in the aerial photograph below: front lawn, structure, driveway, back lawn, pine tree stand and woodlot.

Aerial photograph of our property with a dashed parcel boundary and area labels

My plan is first to inventory this property quite comprehensively, and on the basis of what I find, to then design the site’s retrofit, implement the design and then monitor results.

In his book, Gaia’s Garden, A Guide to Home-Scale Permaculture, 2nd Edition, Toby Hemenway provides a “designer’s checklist” of what to inventory (or, what Hemenway would call “observe”). It’s duplicated here:

  • History of the land: neighbors’ knowledge, library and public records, historical society, maps, photos, backyard archaeology (dig test pits);
  • Homeowners association and government activities: covenants, easements, yard waste pickup, recycling, herbicide spraying, water rationing, zoning and construction restrictions;
  • Nearby plantings that may affect your site (now or when fully grown);
  • Activities of neighbors that may affect design: noise, children, pets, visits, schools, industry, etc.;
  • Resources in the neighborhood: sources of organic matter, soil, and building materials such as sawmills, factories, food processors, stores, landfills, recyclers, nurseries, neighbors;
  • Utilities: power, phone, sewer and gas lines;
  • Areas of shade and sun, and how they change over the year;
  • Wind direction, intensity and change over the seasons;
  • Average and record temperature highs and lows, dates of first and last frosts;
  • Rainfall amounts and seasons, snow, hail;
  • Points of sunrise and sunset and their change over the seasons;
  • Topography, slope and aspect;
  • Rock outcrops, boulders, gravel;
  • Microclimates: cool, hot, wet, dry, sheltered and exposed spots;
  • Soil: drainage, heavy or light, sand or clay, rich or depleted, stable or slumping, compaction;
  • Water: flooding zones, drainage patterns, creeks, gullies, water movement during rain;
  • Views: good, bad and potential;
  • Location of structures on-site and nearby, such as houses, garages, fences and walls, and their effects on the surroundings: shade, runoff, windbreak, etc.;
  • Vegetation: species present, opportunistic or noxious plants, rare species and their state of health;
  • Animals: pets, native and introduced, pests, “scary” animals (snakes, spiders);
  • Traffic and its frequency, heavy or light vehicles, pedestrian traffic, bicycles;
  • Access: ease of bringing in materials, location of faucets, stairs, doors, garage, storage, etc.

Hemenway’s recommendation when taking this inventory is to “try to enter a Zen mind set or whatever it takes to simply observe without planning. Instead of ‘We can put a path here,’ make an observation statement such as ‘There is poor access to this area.’” His concern is that premature design decisions will “collapse the range of possibilities that remain.” I would add that observation and Zen detachment should also span an entire year, so the designer experiences the place in all four seasons before beginning to design.

Posted in Plan | Leave a comment